So, finally forced myself to finish Extinction at the weekend. I did not get on with this at all – the whole book felt like an exercise in trying the reader’s patience. It turns out that two continuous paragraphs of hundreds of pages each, consisting entirely of the same criticisms of bourgeois Austria repeated again and again, in really very basic and graceless style – can become tiresome pretty quickly.
I like to keep things positive when chatting about books, films, music etc if only because there’s just so much negativity available on the internet, and I often get the sense people find it much easier to rip on stuff than talk about something they really love.
On the other hand – it’s great fun. And maybe can tell us more about our tastes. So the Bernhard book got me thinking – what are people’s least favourite books/authors? Who do you think is overrated? Why?
So, this continues my frustrating relationship with John Gray, where I can appreciate he’s a good writer (crisp, clear, readable etc) but his basic positions seem … unfounded to me. And he doesn’t seem particularly interested in arguing for them, but just leans on the fact they’re unpopular to make them “unpalatable truths”, or something.
Middlesex is another case of high expectations – I didn’t read The Virgin Suicides until recently, but it was definitely close to the top of my fiction list last year. That book is incredibly economical, unforgettably eerie and has a genuinely innovative use of a collective unreliable narrator in the neighborhood boys.
Unfortunately I’m not sure Middlesex quite lives up to this. A sprawling – and comparatively conventional – family chronicle, the story follows three generations of a Greek family fleeing war-torn Anatolia in the 20s and settling in Detroit. The novelty here is the connecting thread is the passing down of a recessive gene – having its fateful expression in inbreeding and intersexuality.
The Heart of a Dog is terrific fun. I was a bit hesitant because The Master and Margarita is so good, but it didn’t let me down (and continues the obsession with cats, dogs and devilry).
An updating of Frankenstein to Moscow life in the chaos of the 1920s USSR, it follows the misadventures of a dog rescued off the streets and patched up with various bits of fallen (human) comrades.
It’s a brutal satire of the attempts to create a “new socialist man”, but the effect is pretty timelessly funny, with the dog-creature ending up barking soviet propaganda and haphazardly swearing at everyone. Bulgakov saw it confiscated and banned in his lifetime; it’s a considerable mystery that that was the worst that happened to him.
I like pretty much the whole Nabokov canon, underrated earlier Russian works included – but the run he had writing in English and the American years: Sebastian Knight, Lolita, Pale Fire, Pnin and Speak, Memory – is just unbeatable. I think I could read Pale Fire on an endless loop and not get bored by it.
If you’ve not read any Nabokov … I mean, imagine like Joyce or Borges, then imagine the same mastery of language and artistry but in a form that’s so light-handed, so economical and readable, so natural and funny and lively you can just fly over it … and then you stop and realise that the beauty, the virtuosity, the moving humanism, the word games and the literary references are all there – all at once, all part of the same thing. It’s just joyous maximalism and so damn fun to read.
If I described this as an serious academic work of philosophy arguing how the Problem of Evil (is suffering deserved?) did not disappear into theology in the 18th century – you might not think it’s a exactly a page-turner. But it’s gripping!
Sweet Caress: The Many Lives of Amory Clay is rather standard Boyd – which is to say it contains patches of really excellent writing, particularly in the first and last “lives”, and spirals around a few themes which have maybe become a bit too familiar.
Lectures on Russian Literature by Nabokov is just a joy to read again and again. If you’re at all interested in 19th century Russian Literature this is a delight, and if you’re not, you might well be after reading his hilarious study of Gogol – a lunatic and a genius, in one of the most eccentric works of criticism of all time, which starts with leeches dangling off sick writer’s nose, and then meditates on noses, Russian obsession with noses, Gogol’s desire to become one giant nose, which goes off wondering the streets without his owner’s awareness.